Archive for June, 2009

Agricultural hike

Monday, June 29th, 2009

We live in an area that’s rural in the wild sense whereas my parents live in what I have sometimes cruelly described as an agricultural wasteland.  It is the sort of place where, when you’re hiking, you tend to stick to the hedgerows and copses and be glad they’re there.  But it also offers some educational opportunities.  Antonia had never seen wheat growing before, let alone, barley, beets, corn and rape.  She learned about crop rotation and its purposes, and my mum found her some primitive horse tail plants growing in a freshly ploughed field.  Apparently these grow on impoverished soil, so that would seem to be a bad sign.

We also did some identifying of butterflies and flowers, got herded through a field by a flock of sheep that seemed unduly interested in us, and taught her the proper way of feeding a colt with your hand flat so it doesn’t accidentally bite you.

Razing kids

Saturday, June 27th, 2009

This was my little bit of contact with the homeschooling world for today! Some benighted homeschool football team whose priorities include ‘acedemics’ and ‘atheletics’, somewhere after God and family.  I resisted the temptation to comment.  They don’t like homeschoolers at Science Blogs and probably nothing will convert them.  Besides, its no skin off my nose if some random homeschoolers want to make idiots of themselves, just as, if I were a practicing scientist, I wouldn’t consider the whole enterprise invalidated because some jerk falsified some results.

Anyway, after a while I began to think that, spelling and religious worldview aside, the list is not terrible in principle.  Homeschooling parents are parents as well as educators and probably should put a child’s physical and psychological health before academics, and way before any ridiculous competitive sports (I will get into how I am doing this in practice in a minute).  If they send their kids to school they should still ensure that those are the priorities.  Not that I think intellectual development or education is unimportant.  Just slightly less important.  And for another thing an all round healthy lifestyle is a pre-requisite for successful academics in the first place.   As I find out every time Little Miss doesn’t get enough sleep for any reason.

Right now, we are on holiday which means that academics consist of me asking her maths puzzles and tickling her when she gets them right, her reading comic books and a chapter of history every day,  and….tadaaa… family and spiritual development!

This takes the form of my father’s Special Curriculum for Raising Skeptical Children in which the child learns that any utterance by an adult is just as likely to be BS as not.  The successful student should come up with some suitably pertinent and witty answer that avoids overstepping some invisible line that they have to discover themselves.  My brother and I are graduates of this particular course, but so far my daughter is in rather over her head.  Perhaps understandably, I had grown up in the belief that talking tripe with bells on is a man’s job whereas dh, being of the American persuasion, is apt to verge on the literal.  All in all, she hasn’t had much practice, and her responses have been a mixture of moments of pure genius, interspersed with exhaustion.

My favourite moment so far was when she stunned the old boy into silence for a while with a pun on the word ‘arse’.  It was a good pun, but unfortunately based on her sincere belief that an arse is a kind of donkey.  This morning we reduced her to exhaustion by 11.00 by explaining to her that you could easily understand the nature of the square root if you considered the carrot, which is a conical root.

She rallied round by lunchtime to nearly finish me off at hangman with the word ‘raze’. When I asked her if she knew what it meant she said “yes, you ‘raze’ a child”. I see her point, though I’m not sure if she did.

Fortunately it’s not all cruelty to children.  Grandad does get down on the floor with the blocks and stuffed animals for precisely one hour per day in which he does exactly what she tells him.  After that, we have to rally round to lift him up again with levers and pulleys and he goes off to tinker with his dvd player until it works so she can watch some ghastly film.  And he makes her whatever flavour of ice cream she desires with his own hands.

Grandma tends to stick to natural history and gardening.  This can be a little bit morbid because it tends to revolve around pest species and the things you can do to them. Still, it’s an education.

And me?  I had a lovely nap this afternoon.

Travel day

Thursday, June 25th, 2009

What to do on a travel day?  Luckily we are ‘only’ going to the UK, leaving at 15:20 and probably reaching my parents’ house about 23:00.  It should still be light by then. In the meantime Antonia did maths while I packed, read some Horrid Henry, and we found time to look at this butterfly wing under the microscope.  The butterfly died on our terrace, so we seized our chance.

Butterfly eyespot

Coraline review

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

Antonia is still recovering from seeing Coraline, although I suspect she is playing it a bit for sympathy at this point!

I quite liked this film, Mike didn’t, but she was curled up in her chair with her eyes closed before it was halfway through.  A shame, because she had looked forward to seeing it.  And this, mind you, is the child who sat through Pirates of the Carribean 1, 2, and 3 at a friend’s house without blenching.  Coraline just pressed all her fear buttons.

It might be that we bear an unfortunate resemblance to Coraline’s parents.  I hope we are not so inattentive, but we are closely associated with computers.  Then there’s the division of labour – Mike does the cooking, I do the cleaning, which is the same.  And then, I suppose there is just the whole temptation of ‘better than life’ parents that many kids can maybe relate to and that turns sour in the film.  Or the fear of a door in your own house with a horrid witch behind it.  Whatever it was it genuinely, seriously upset her for a bit.  And to think that some people I know stake their faith on animations as opposed to movies with human actors for not scaring children.

Maths and gender bias

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009

I might be back blogging.  I have been too busy/jetlagged/under-the-weather-due-to-overbusyness, etc…  Still homeschooling though, so here is today’s best incident.

We were doing maths, when Antonia suddenly said “who wrote this book anyway?”. So I turned to the front and read her the names of the authors. “Humph!”, she said, “all men! I suppose that’s why there’s so many boys in it”.

I was quite surprised. I hadn’t noticed any such bias. But she is more sensitive to that sort of thing than me, and there certainly were no girls on that particular page. I decided to do a people count to see if she had formed a false impression. The book is divided into five sections, and after counting the first two, I though she was mistaken. The proportion of girls to boys was so close, it showed every sign of having been carefully engineered. Then I got to the third section, the one we are just finishing, and saw that she was very right indeed.

Perhaps the worst thing was that I then started noticing the ratio of adult women to men throughout the book, which is very poor. And whilst many of the men were professionals of various kinds, almost all of the few women were somebody’s mother or a customer. Here are my results.

Section   1    2    3    4    5
________________________________
Girls    42   28   27   23   20
Boys     41   26   43   28   24
Women     1    9    5    4    5
Men       4   12   16   19   15

I won’t name and shame the maths book. For one thing, I’m otherwise very pleased with it. For another, it’s a French one, so I don’t imagine many people who happen here would be using it. I just thought it was very interesting that some children actually notice these things. So yes, it probably is worth making the effort to be ‘politically correct’.

Now I suppose I should get my act together and write a letter to the publisher, saying how much I like their book, but…